tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660089177097719300.post8525335745997871408..comments2024-03-27T23:59:01.850-07:00Comments on Writing About Writing (And Occasionally Some Writing): Looking Back Down the MountainChris Brecheenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07819138776404280633noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660089177097719300.post-17588744441440892592014-01-15T23:05:33.753-08:002014-01-15T23:05:33.753-08:00True. Maybe "widely read" would be bett...True. Maybe "widely read" would be better.Chris Brecheenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07819138776404280633noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660089177097719300.post-84179809498756786102014-01-15T18:18:17.347-08:002014-01-15T18:18:17.347-08:00Just one point - "well read" could be co...Just one point - "well read" could be confused for "well-read". At first glance, I thought you were claiming to have a better education or exposure to literature than most first time published authors. I'm guessing the intended meaning was that you have more readers than those guys, right? (I believe the lack of a hyphen makes it mean what you want it to mean, but I still got confused.)Valery Northhttp://valerynorth.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.com