I have a question for all of you--especially my regular readers.
I have a piece of fiction that I've been working on polishing to post here, but it's clocking in at about 27 pages. It's still a short story, but it's fairly long. By comparison, my prior pieces of fiction, namely Penumbra and Falling From Orbit, have been between ten and twelve pages. So this new piece would be two to three times bigger than that.
That's a huge honking wall of text for anything in an online medium.
So my question is, in general, which would you find less annoying to read, a huge wall of text that would be 27 pages long or a story broken up into three or four smaller entries with a link to the next part at the bottom of the page. (It would still go up all at once--I won't pull any "To Be Continued" crap on you--it would just be broken up into multiple smaller posts, each with a link to the others.
Which would you find less offensive?
In general, I am watching closely to see how my fiction is received here to get an idea as to how to proceed. If it seems successful, I may keep putting it here and even try to figure out how to offer my longer works as serial posts or free PDFs. If it's not at all received well, I may try to do a more traditional publishing route using "Hey check out my moderately successful blog" as part of a cover letter. And somewhere in the middle, of course, I investigate e-publishing and print on demand--hopefully for far, far less than traditional retail price. So input like this is actually extremely helpful to me.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Question Regarding Minimum Obnoxicality
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
How being a writer helped me rewrite a sexist trope...for real. [Edit 3 (7/25/13): I speak to some of the more common comments, questions,...
Well....it finally happened. My "can't even" about the comments on my Facebook page went from figurative to literal. At o...
So if you've been on Facebook sometime in the last fifty years or so, you've probably run across this little turd of a meme. I...
My suspicion is we're going to hear a lot about mental illness in the next few days. A lot. And my prediction is that it's going to...
Come see the full comic at: http://jensorensen.com/2016/11/15/donald-trump-election-win-reactions-cartoon/ If you are still trying to ...
Image description: A fountain pen writing on lined paper. These are the brass tacks. The bare bones. The pulsing core of effective writi...
I don't normally mess with author gossip here on Writing About Writing . Our incestual little industry has enough tricky-to-navigate g...
Ready to do some things for your craft that will terrify you even more than a sewer-dwelling clown? Oh what I wouldn't give for a si...
This might be a personal question, but I saw that you once used to be Muslim on one of your other posts. Why did you leave? It's fun...
1. Great writing involves great risk–the risk of terrible writing. Writing that involves no risk is merely forgettable–utterly. 2. When yo...
I wouldn't mind a to-be-continued. I think breaking it up onto 3-4 separate pieces is a great idea. Please post your fiction. I love it.ReplyDelete
Thanks! I'm working on getting more up and getting it up more frequently.Delete
How about 27 parts, so each part is a page? Then reading it would be like reading on an e-reader? But I don't know what's best to do.ReplyDelete
I like to read shorter pages with more sections when I read fan fic.
~nods~ I'm not sure about 27 parts. :-p But I can break it up a little.Delete
4 sections. Even though 27 pages isn't that bad, not all of us are able to read that in one sitting (school, work, family, etc). It will let us set down the text in clear areas and pick it up again without a whole heap of mindless scrolling and searching.ReplyDelete
That's a good point with something that long. Electronic medium doesn't provide for a bookmark within a single page.Delete
For reading on the computer, I would definitely prefer it broken up into parts, probably something like 3-5 depending on where the natural breaks occur in the story.ReplyDelete
Thanks. This seems to be the unanimous opinion.Delete